|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-7-15 22:16:21
|
显示全部楼层
第二篇 http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200707
不交钱看不到全文，但能看到Summary和一个有James Fallows解说的幻灯片。
以下是Philip Baker写的Summary
Do you think the Chinese are stripping America of its profits and jobs? Read this excerpt from James Fallows' cover story from The Atlantic. It shreds to pieces the simplistic explanations we're used to hearing. Then go buy the magazine and read the entire article.
"Has the move to China been good for American companies? The answer would seemingly have to be yes -- otherwise, why would they go there? It is conceivable that bad partnerships, stolen intellectual property, dilution of brand name, logistics nightmares, or other difficulties have given many companies a sour view of outsourcing; I have heard examples in each category from foreign executives. But the more interesting theme I have heard from them, which explains why they are willing to surmount the inconveniences, involves something called the "smiley curve."
The curve is named for the U-shaped arc of the 1970s-era smiley-face icon, and it runs from the beginning to the end of a product's creation and sale. At the beginning is the company's brand: HP, Siemens, Dell, Nokia, Apple. Next comes the idea for the product: an iPod, a new computer, a camera phone. After that is high-level industrial design -- the conceiving of how the product will look and work. Then the detailed engineering design for how it will be made. Then the necessary components. Then the actual manufacture and assembly. Then the shipping and distribution. Then retail sales. And, finally, service contracts and sales of parts and accessories.
The significance is that China's activity is in the middle stages -- manufacturing, plus some component supply and engineering design -- but America's is at the two ends, and those are where the money is. The smiley curve, which shows the profitability or value added at each stage, starts high for branding and product concept, swoops down for manufacturing, and rises again in the retail and servicing stages. The simple way to put this -- that the real money is in brand name, plus retail -- may sound obvious, but its implications are illuminating.
At each factory I visited, I asked managers to estimate how much of a product's sales price ended up in whose hands. The strength of the brand name was the most important variable. If a product is unusual enough and its brand name attractive enough, it could command so high a price that the retailer might keep half the revenue. (Think: an Armani suit, a Starbucks latte.) Most electronics products are now subject to much fiercer price competition, since it is so easy for shoppers to find bargains on the Internet. Therefore the generic Windows-style laptops I saw in one modern factory might go for around $1,000 in the United States, with the retailer keeping less than $50.
Where does the rest of the money go? The manager of that factory guessed that Intel and Microsoft together would collect about $300, and that the makers of the display screen, the disk-storage devices, and other electronic components might get $150 or so apiece. The keyboard makers would get $15 or $20; FedEx or UPS would get slightly less. When all other costs were accounted for, perhaps $30 to $40 -- 3 to 4 percent of the total -- would stay in China with the factory owners and the young women on the assembly lines." |
|
发表于 2007-7-15 21:32:53
